Search for: "Marriage of Perry"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,093
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
Perry, the recent U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Perry, Freedom of Conscience as Religious and Moral Freedom, (Journal of Law and Religion, Forthcoming).Haider Ala Hamoudi, Repugnancy in the Arab World, (Willamette Law Review, Vol. 48:427, 2012).Mark P. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
Naim, where the Court altogether dishonestly dismissed for want of a federal constitutional question Virginia's ban on inter-racial marriage. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 7:15 am
Maybe they aren't ready to rule for same-sex marriage, as we saw in Perry, but a ruling against same-sex marriage seems out of the question. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am
Perry; the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
Perry, the Court let stand a Federal District Court ruling in California that an amendment to the California Constitution limiting marriage to opposite sex couples was unconstitutional. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Perry on the ground that it “gives politicians an indirect, backdoor veto – the power to pull the plug on a successful ballot measure simply by leaving it undefended in court. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
Writing for JURIST, Jessica Levinson summarizes the Court’s opinion in Perry, while Howard Mintz of the San Jose Mercury Newsreports on Perry and its implications for future challenges to same-sex marriage. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:14 am
It would also undermine the argument that Perry v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
That Proposition amended the California state constitution to prohibit same-sex marriage. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:15 pm
Perry last Wednesday, the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Perry & US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 1:14 am
It would also undermine the argument that Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Perry. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Perry, in which the Court held that the sponsors of California’s ban on same-sex marriage lacked standing to defend the initiative on appeal, and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
This decision returned California to the list of states permitting same-sex marriage. [read post]
