Search for: "Matter of A.D" Results 241 - 260 of 1,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the Court, that, in a proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation and custody under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct the “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel and expert fees under Domestic Relations Law § 237 before that party has been adjudicated a parent. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:08 am
After ruling that the grievance was subject to arbitration, the arbitrator concluded that Schmitt’s termination was in accordance with the last chance agreement and thus such action did not violate the parties' collective bargaining agreement.The Appellate Division initially noted that although Supreme Court acknowledged that resolving issues relating to the parties' collective bargaining is an appropriate matter for arbitration here Schmitt’s entering into the last… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 10:15 am by WCK Director
Emotional Tension Claim Following 9/11 Attack – Not Compensable   In the Matter of Young v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:26 am
The Court said that the processing of a contract grievance was governed by the provision in the collective bargaining agreement and if the agreement does not give unit members the right to demand arbitration, only the union had the right to seek to arbitrate the matter. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 3:16 am
The union grieved the deckhand’s dismissal and ultimately the matter was submitted to arbitration. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 8:29 pm by Patricia Salkin
Matter of Pepe Porsche of Larchmont v Planning Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, 216 A.D.3d 1163, 191 N.Y.S.3d 418 (2 Dept. 2023) [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:44 pm
A Kings County Will Contest Attorney finds that the testatrix's plan was to provide a family burial resting place (see Matter of McNeil, 18 A.D.2d 170, 238 N.Y.S.2d 389). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 5:45 pm
However, in the case of Matter of Mergenhagen (50 A.D.3d 1486 1488, 856 N.Y.S.2d 389) the Surrogate may disqualify an individual from receiving letters of administration where friction or hostility between such individual and a beneficiary or a co-administrator or co-administratrix, especially where such individual is at fault, interferes with the proper administration of the estate, and future cooperation is unlikely. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Watts, 211 Conn. 323 (1989), Matter of Keuning, 190 A.D.2d 1033, 593 N.Y.S.2d 653 (4th Dept. 1993), and Matter of Molloy, 214 A.D.2d 171, 631 N.Y.S.2d 910 (2nd Dept. 1995), Troy v. [read post]