Search for: "Matter of Beers v Beers"
Results 241 - 260
of 614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 1:59 am
Case C 147/14 Loutfi Management Propriété intellectuelle SARL v AMJ Meatproducts NV, Halalsupply NV is a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling last Thursday in a Community trade mark-related reference from Belgium. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Why this happened is another matter that has not been publicly explained. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:13 am
The Court said in the 1907 case of Halter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
B.A.S. v S.R.S. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
Horowitz v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:00 am
Great American Alliance Insurance Company v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the allegation that the child suffered substantial pain is rank hearsay; the informant mother, Doreen Johnson, cannot attest, as a matter of first party knowledge, to what her child felt 3. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Furthermore, the allegation that the child suffered substantial pain is rank hearsay; the informant mother, Doreen Johnson, cannot attest, as a matter of first party knowledge, to what her child felt 3. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:27 am
Would you take it to the district court in order to add more evidence, keeping in mind the possibility (after Shammas v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
[Maureen] testified that, over the past several years, [he] drank sixteen ounces of rum nightly and occasionally consumed beer in conjunction with the liquor. . . . [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:00 am
The Sixth Circuit ruled that the liquor commission had violated Flying Dog’s First Amendment rights and that the liquor commission should have been on notice that “banning a beer label for vulgarity violates the First Amendment” based on Bad Frog Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Against this body of case law, PCCM pointed to judgments in several other common law jurisdictions, including: Ireland: C&A Modes v C&A (Waterford) Ltd which Lord Neuberger said [39] shows a “misapprehension” of the reasoning in Crazy Horse; Canada: Orkin Exterminating Co Inc v Pestco Co of Canada Ltd, which was “of no assistance” [40] since the US-based plaintiff had thousands of customers in CanadaNew Zealand: Dominion Rent A Car Ltd… [read post]
12 May 2015, 1:53 am
Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc [2015] EWHC 1271 (Ch) is the latest of Mr Justice Arnold's trade mark rulings in the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
10 May 2015, 11:16 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 11:16 am
In the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am
Beer Institute, 491 U.S. 324, 336 (1989). [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:44 am
See Parent v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 6:22 am
The case, Spokeo v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 1:47 pm
There are 41 decisions between 1999 and 2013, some of which concern relatively minor matters. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 3:10 pm
Beer and nachos, while they may feel necessary, aren’t deductible. [read post]
