Search for: "Matter of Booker"
Results 241 - 260
of 556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2006, 10:40 am
Dec. 28, 2006) (available here) has also kept the parsimony provision from having a clear consequential impact on post-Booker sentencing outcomes. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
Given the many procedural requirements of the sentencing statutes (and let us not forget Rule 32, as well), post-Booker sentences are open to a large number of procedural challenges on appeal. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:46 am
" Finally, the Court noted that Rule 32's other procedural protections help to insure that all relevant matters pertaining to sentencing have been considered before the judge makes a final sentencing determination. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 2:31 am
id=1011230 Sentencing Law and Policy: A strong pitch to SCOTUS to have Booker ...By Doug B. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 5:04 pm
When Booker was decided, DOJ cried the sky was falling and concocted emergency measures to “save” the guidelines. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:05 pm
Procedural review would lay the matter to rest, comporting with both parts of the Booker opinion and achieving the maximumdegree of sentencing uniformity on the basis of judgefound facts that the Constitution permits. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
Booker to make the guidelines advisory. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 07a0400p.06 2007/10/01 Smith v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 10:50 am
Here, the Circuit did an about-face, relying, of all things, on Booker, which of course has nothing to do with commerce, to conclude that Fabian is "no longer good law. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 10:41 am
The Circuit further states, "Indeed, as a matter of policy, we agree with the District Court that a 100-to-1 ratio leads to unjust sentences,... [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:04 am
Or does historical accuracy no longer matter? [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:15 am
Left open, however, is whether, when and how SCOTUS will finally get to the issue of Apprendi and Blakely and Booker retroactivity. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:21 am
Indeed, for an opinion that many hoped could help clarify post-Booker sentencing realities, Rita strikes me as more likely to create continued confusion because everyone will be able to find some passages to their linking. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:23 am
Indeed, for an opinion that many hoped could help clarify post-Booker sentencing realities, Rita strikes me as more likely to create continued confusion because everyone will be able to find some passages to their liking. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 8:53 pm
Booker, making the federal sentencing guideline system advisory rather than mandatory. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 9:17 am
post-Booker precedents, but has only a few sentences discussing the case facts. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 3:33 pm
But Booker is right that there remains much to be unravelled. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:35 am
” Booker, 543 U.S. at 229. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:53 pm
Booker and Fanfan cracked a door open on a new world of possibility for federal criminal defense. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 1:44 pm
Booker, 2022 IL App (1st) 211055 It also does not matter if there has been a lull in alleged abuse. [read post]
