Search for: "Matter of C. F. v C. M."
Results 241 - 260
of 1,375
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
The MNE is exppected to use its private lawmaking authority (through contract and internal governance mechanisms) to harden internal norms , the success of which is to be a matter of accountability to a national organ asserting a domestic agenda through law. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
King and the late New York lawyer, Marvin M. [read post]
23 May 2021, 8:37 am
Calls on the European Council to take a firm stance against the Chinese sanctions and to adopt conclusions on the matter; takes the view that these sanctions, as well as the negative evolution and deteriorations within China and of China as an international actor, should be adequately reflected and responded to in the ongoing review of the joint communication ‘EU-China – A Strategic Outlook’ with a view to moving towards a more assertive EU-China strategy with the goal of… [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
(f) It is the policy of the Federal Government that: (i) information and communications technology (ICT) service providers entering into contracts with agencies must promptly report to such agencies when they discover a cyber incident involving a software product or service provided to such agencies or involving a support system for a software product or service provided to such agencies;… [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am
Many thanks to our excellent pro bono counsel Jeffrey M. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 7:04 am
C. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It held that contrary to Matter of Barbara T. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 10:27 am
Cameron and Judge Kristen F. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
(English MT translation by Deepl.)Eine Rückzahlungsmöglichkeit der Beschwerdegebühr gemäß Regel 103 (4) c) EPÜ kann es auch dann geben, wenn ein Antrag auf mündliche Verhandlung nicht vom Beschwerdeführer zurückgenommen wurde, sondern von einem anderen Verfahrensbeteiligten, der keine Beschwerde eingelegt hat (siehe Nrn. 8.3 - 8.9 der Entscheidungsgründe).The decision is in German. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:18 am
The fact that This Old Gal’s notice to Apple didn’t comply with 512(c)(3) just highlights its 512(f) deficiency. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 9:04 pm
Martha C. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 8:33 am
Students, just like adults, hold opinions about all sorts of matters. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
Paul M. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
In some instances these issues touch on matters that have significant relevance to political and legal theory generally, and for this reason alone are worth reading. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:40 am
F. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
NBCUniversal Media, LLC, 734 F.3d 610, 614–15 (7th Cir. 2013); see also Lakireddy v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:28 am
” Robin v. [read post]
