Search for: "Matter of English v Smith" Results 241 - 260 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Max Mosley was unsuccessful in his long running campaign to compel the English press to give advance notice of threatened invasions of privacy. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Coffee discussed dueling class actions and the ruling in Smith v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
Eriq Gardner at THR, Esq. has the story, as does Ray Beckerman at Recording Industry v. the People. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
Finally, in West Tankers the European Court of Justice was asked to rule on an anti-suit injunction issued by English courts in order to prevent Italian courts from proceeding with an action in disregard of an arbitration clause.23 The Grand Chamber held that an anti suit injunction in support of an arbitration clause was irreconcilable with the principle of mutual trust and that the Italian courts were deemed to apply the Brussels I Regulation and Article II of the New York Convention… [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
  There’s one footnote, citing four cases from three jurisdictions:  Smith v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The covenant has not been incorporated into English law, but the UK is signed up to the covenant.Parliament has decided that the convicted prisoners have forfeited their right to have a say in the way the country is governed for the period during which they are in custody. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
The UK Human Rights blog reports: Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal Philips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 28 - read judgment. [read post]