Search for: "Matter of Martial" Results 241 - 260 of 1,027
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2010, 10:49 pm by Dwight Sullivan
MA3 Demartino’s testimony was probably the most important portion of the court-martial. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 7:07 am
The agenda for this meeting will include consideration of proposed changes to the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, and other matters relating to the operation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice throughout the Armed Forces.72 Fed. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:38 am
The judge has yet to rule in this matter but has sealed the case against media/public access in interest of the parties' privacy. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:07 pm by Wells Bennett
 The case spoke of “practical obstacles;” well, there’s no practical reason not to have civilian jurors in this matter, Hurley argues. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:05 am
That would look too much like the Bush approach.Meanwhile, for those in the know, a court martial under the UCMJ would be acceptable--and legal under common article 3 of the Geneva Conventions--but the problem is that the difference between a court martial and a military commission is not well understood by the international public at large. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Ruth Levush
The United Kingdom has operated a system of military courts-martial for centuries and, effective in 2009, created a Court Martial as a permanent, standing court for military matters. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:33 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
His submission falls well short of carrying his burden to establish as a factual matter that the allegations lodged against him by the Federal Defendants were false[.] [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 6:43 am by Lev Sugarman
And Bobby Chesney reflected on judicial deference on national security fact matters and what the proclamation may mean for Big Bend National Park. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm by Steve Vladeck
Thus, as Justice Black put it with respect to courts-martial in United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:07 am
Courts Martial are not proper forums for trying such grave offence like murder. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 7:21 am by Anna Bower
And he claims that Flynn’s public statements about Trump potentially declaring martial law are “utterly irrelevant,” because Trump never did declare martial law. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 7:57 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Prepares and renders legal advice on disciplinary matters, including admonitions, reprimands, nonjudicial punishment, and statutory pretrial advice in prospective court-martial cases. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:09 pm by Viking
Supreme Court that an appellee may also "urge in support of a decree any matter appearing in the record, although his argument may involve an attack upon the reasoning of the lower court or an insistence upon matter overlooked or ignored by it. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:24 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
  The prosecution needed to check three foundational boxes–but they didn’t according to the ACCA. (1) the recorded statement contains matters of which a witness once had knowledge but now has insufficient recollection to enable the witness to testify fully and accurately; Continue reading → [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:52 am by Viking
In a ruling with potential national implications even though based only on state law, the Ohio Supreme Court this morning in a 5-2 opinion decided that the state’s new sex offender registration requirements were punitive and thus could not, as a matter of Ohio state constitutional law, be applied to offenders who committed offenses before this new registration law was put into effect. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 8:33 pm by Viking
I think Chemerinsky accepts too readily prosecutors’ predictions of difficulties that would be created by a win for Williams, and he fails to take into account the fact that numerous states have long operated without undue difficulty under the regime that Williams seeks to establish as a matter of constitutional law. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 2:54 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
First, as an ancient principle directing judges to construe ambiguous criminal statutes narrowly, SeeAntonin Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation 29 (Amy Gutmann ed., 1997) (“The rule of lenity is almost as old as the common law itself, so I suppose that is validated by sheer antiquity. [read post]