Search for: "Matter of Mississippi State Bar"
Results 241 - 260
of 490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2016, 12:35 pm
When states such as Alabama, Mississippi, and Arkansas are charging 7.5-10% interest, one has to ask whether this is another example of “Carville was right” except that we might be a little less modern. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:36 am
At issue in this case is whether Constitutional Due Process rights bar the state from repeated attempts to try a criminal defendant. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Mississippi, a state that claims tourism as one of its biggest industries, apparently did not account for the cost of backlash before it adopted a similar law a few weeks later.The Sanctity of BathroomsBathrooms re-emerged this week as a center point of two stories, with oddly juxtaposed visions their significance in society.The U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am
Now about 200,000 of it citizens will be barred from voting because they lack the required ID mandated by the Republican-run state government. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
A few in-state services by visiting employees, in-state members and contractors insufficient. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:14 am
That appears to be exactly the liability that § 230 bars. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 2:04 pm
I agree that Arnold Schwartzenegger and, for that matter, Jennifer Granholm are regrettably barred even from running for the office because of this indefensible piece of text. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
The above email exchange was a long time ago, but I pull it out now because the American Bar Association Journal just came out with an article, Chinese companies doing business in the US build barriers to legal remedies, propagating the same mistake. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
” Now that the latter matter’s been completely briefed, it’s earned its first relist. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
Some of these cases turn out to be huge winners, others turn out not to matter. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
While RCRA’s anti-duplication provisions “may ultimately bar a plaintiff from obtaining relief in a RCRA suit, that result does not mean the statutory limitation is jurisdictional barring recovery”. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
Lyons stated she lived and voted in Forrest County, Mississippi, and she would “be paying attention” to Raven’s case McCool also tweeted up a storm, such as “Shouldn’t judges base decisions about kids on evidence? [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied "clearly established" law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern "the matter[s] pending before the jury. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
For the first time since this crusty old man was on the bar mitzvah circuit, the United States has a Triple Crown winner. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Petitioners ask whether the Second Amendment bars a San Francisco ordinance requiring all residents who keep handguns in their homes to stow them in a lock box or disable them with a trigger lock whenever the owners are not carrying them. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
The petition asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
§ 2254(d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied “clearly established” law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern “the matter[s] pending before the jury”? [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am
I hope Mississippi voters will keep this ruling in mind during the next election cycle. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
In a fourth state, Minnesota, a majority of voters rejected a proposed constitutional amendment to bar same-sex marriage – only the second time that any state’s voters had ever done so. [read post]
