Search for: "Matter of Parsons" Results 241 - 260 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The matter now goes to the Justice Department, which will decide whether to pursue the matter. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am by INFORRM
On 23 January 2024, there was a pre-trial review before Chamberlain J in the case of Parsons v Atkinson QB-2021-004305. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
COMMENT BY COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT, MONTSERRAT VILARDELL, Jamie Maclaren and Ryan Parsons First and foremost, our client was delighted to be finally granted relief from paying some $3,600 in accumulated hearing fees. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
On 19 April 2024, Farbey J handed down judgement in the case of Parsons v Atkinson [2024] EWHC 888 (KB) in favour of the defendant. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The investigation will concern the impartiality requirements for programs dealing with matters of major political controversy and major matters relating to current public policy. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
., 26 Cal.4th 465, 478 (2001), when it held that negligent-entrustment-based claims against gun manufacturers were "product liability" actions subject to limits placed on such claims, no matter how the plaintiffs tried to "recast" their claim as something else.Calling an inadequate warning claim based upon product labeling a "misrepresentation," and allowing liability against the purported author of the misrepresentation even though the defendant didn't… [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Biden Transition Elevates Former Facebook Exec as Ethics Arbiter Politico – Alex Thompson and Theodoric Meyer | Published: 10/1/2020 Joe Biden’s transition team named Jessica Hertz, until recently a Facebook executive focused on government regulations, as its general counsel and charged her with navigating conflicts-of-interest and other ethical issues for the Biden administration-in-waiting, a move that drew immediate fire from the left. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Rudy Giuliani Facing Inquiry into Whether He Lobbied Trump for Turkey MSN – Christian Berthelsen, Greg Farrell, and Chris Strom (Bloomberg) | Published: 6/29/2021 Rudolph Giuliani is the subject of a Justice Department inquiry into possible foreign lobbying for Turkish interests separate from a criminal probe of his activities in Ukraine, according to people familiar with the matter. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Former Interior Secretary Didn’t Violate Lobbying Laws, Watchdog Finds MSN – Joshua Partlow (Washington Post) | Published: 5/19/2022 The Interior Department’s internal watchdog said it found no evidence that former Secretary David Bernhardt violated lobbying laws regarding a former client, a California water district that is the nation’s largest agricultural water supplier, although he continued to advise them on legislative matters on occasion after he… [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
The central issue was whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted to restrain the respondent from making allegedly defamatory statements on a matter of public interest. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The hospital’s chief executive stated that “all appropriate regulatory and disciplinary steps will be taken and Kensington Palace confirmed that the report was “a matter for the London Clinic. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984); see also Matter of Continental Illinois Securities Litigation, 732 F.2d 1302, 1308 (7th Cir. 1984) ("the policy reasons for granting public access to criminal proceedings apply to civil proceedings as well"). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Ohio 2005) (finding that defendant company’s production of the audit committee’s PowerPoint presentation of investigation to plaintiff shareholders resulted in full subject matter waiver of the attorney-client privilege); Gruss v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by Michael Oykhman
What is an “Indecent Act” in Canada Committing an indecent act is criminalized under section 173 of the Criminal Code of Canada. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm by Stephen Page
Deane, Dawson & Gaudron JJ held at [16]: “Paternity is a serious matter, both for the father and for the child. [read post]