Search for: "Matter of Price v Evers"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,191
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
Not surprisingly, the expert engaged by the husband, Mr A, said that the shares were worth a lot less; but the expert engaged for the wife said that the shares were worth a lot more.And for this argument about the value, the parties engaged in a trial in the Family Court that lasted eight days.Why ever did the parties not engage a joint expert, consistent with usual practice, and save themselves an enormous amount in legal and accounting fees? [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 8:33 am
There, I did it - two items on two different issues, all for the price of one admission. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 7:29 am
Div case, Pappas v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm
BFP v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:49 am
It matters. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Parcside Equity, LLC v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
This Kat and Tim have promised each other a game of chess ever since 1994, and it still hasn't happened. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 6:18 pm
Mutual Pharmaceutical Company v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
In theory, that should be easier than ever today. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
. would yield truly enormous profits if those prices were actually paid. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Real pomegranate juice matters; taste is important; nutrition is importantSurvey about role of price versus health versus taste. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
P. 16(d)(2) for that matter). [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 6:51 am
See Gray v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Securities class actions and derivative litigation will likely follow a large price decline, no matter what. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am
” No one, ever, died for a flag. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
" Price v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
V’s constitutional amendment processes. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
We assume (for the purposes of this post) that every bad thing that these opinions recount about the defendant’s off-label promotion was true.That doesn’t matter. [read post]
