Search for: "Matter of Sharma"
Results 241 - 260
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2010, 8:25 pm
However, the reference made by the Bombay High Court, in Mauli Chand Sharma and another Vs. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 8:17 pm
However, the reference made by the Bombay High Court, in Mauli Chand Sharma and another Vs. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:51 pm
Sundara Rajan, pp.201-206 | HTML | DOC | PDF | Reviewed Articles The Software Patent Thicket: A Matter Of Disclosure Rosa Maria Ballardini, pp.207-233 | HTML | DOC | PDF | Open Access to Journal Content as a Case Study in Unlocking IP Roger Clarke and Danny Kingsley, pp.234-258 | HTML | DOC | PDF | National and International Dimensions of Copyright's Public Domain (An Australian Case Study) Graham Greenleaf, pp.259-340 | HTML | DOC | PDF | Internet Content Regulation and the World… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 12:46 pm
It was expected that in these circumstances, the NHRC, would conduct its own investigation into the matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 7:59 am
(Click here for our blog post on the matter.) [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:22 am
According to a story by the WSJ’s Amol Sharma, the DOJ has begun an initial review to determine whether large U.S. telecom companies such as AT&T and Verizon Communications have abused the market power they’ve amassed in recent years, according to people familiar with the matter. [read post]
10 May 2009, 12:27 pm
The Judge’s summation was clear and accurate (and worth quoting at length): (1) The issue of whether there has been a surrender by operation of law after a tenant’s abandonment of the leased premises must be determined by evaluating the effect of the landlord’s conduct as a whole (cf London Borough of Brent v Sharma (1992) 25 HLR 257 at 259). [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
In a judgment published yesterday (Shashou & Ors v Sharma ([2009] EWHC 957 (Comm)), Cook J. ruled that West Tankers is irrelevant when the injunction enjoins the parties from litigating in India in contravention with an agreement providing for ICC arbitration in London. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
" This hardly clears up the matter. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:11 pm
by N.B.Sarojini and Aastha Sharma. 3. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:48 pm
In their judgment, Justices Pasayat and Mukundakam Sharma agreed with the petitioners that the extension given to Justice Ashok Kumar as Additional Judge of the Madras High Court, when he was found unsuitable for elevation as Permanent Judge in 2005 by the then Chief Justice R.C.Lahoti was wrong. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 6:46 am
The matter relating to lifting of Maharashtra Government's ban on James Laine's book, Shivaji came up for hearing before Justices Arijit Pasayat and Mukundakam Sharma today, and has been adjourned for four weeks. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:24 am
Karmeshu and Sharma to Performance Evaluation, which publishes research papers on the performance of computers, computer systems, and telecommunications. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 12:44 pm
The matter will now be heard after four weeks. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 4:28 am
Sharma, No. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 3:13 am
The petitioner, ML Sharma, alleged that the amount of debt held by small and marginal farmers was way below the Rs. 60,000-crore figure suggested by the Government. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 8:13 am
Owens argued that the felony murder aggravators did not matter because the same evidence would have been presented and that the "label" assigned to the aggravator did not matter. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:37 am
Via Compete America H-1B Visa and EB Green Card Stories: America's Losses Are Our Foreign Competitors' GainsPersonal Accounts of the Crisis The following stories illustrate the impact that H-1B visa shortages and EB green card backlogs have on highly educated foreign-born professionals, U.S. employers and our collective ability as a nation to compete in the global marketplace. [read post]
5 May 2007, 12:53 pm
All American judges are conservative (no matter how some of them might kid themselves) in the sense that their job is to enforce (and reinforce) existing power relationships. [read post]