Search for: "Matter of Singh v Singh" Results 241 - 260 of 512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2010, 3:11 am by INFORRM
  Writing in the Guardian Simon Singh welcomes the decision. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Not only does it seem correct as a matter of principle, but also the lack of a lawful power to detain is likely, without more, to give rise to practical difficulties. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am by CMS
Its President has to hold or have held high judicial office (the post is currently held by Lord Justice Singh), its [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Deparment – a case of driving government policy further underground? [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:44 am by The Legal Blog
But if he wanders out - side the contract and deals with matters not allotted to him, he com- mits a jurisdictional error. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am by Conor McEvily
Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog notes that with the Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
Further he found that provided the SSHD applied the Hardial Singh principals, where a reasonableness test is applied to detention, then there was no need for specific custody time limits. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:48 am by Rosalind English
A A O v Entry Clearance Officer [2011] EWCA Civ 840 - read judgment   1 Crown Office Row’s Sarabjit Singh appeared for the Respondent in this case. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
In Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:49 am
To make matters slightly more complicated, the latter of these decisions cites Makhan Lal Jain v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 3:11 am by Peter Mahler
Singh followed a 1994 First Department precedent in rejecting the argument that a New York court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to dissolve a foreign entity, in that case a Delaware limited partnership. [read post]