Search for: "Matter of State of New York v John P." Results 241 - 260 of 403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Next week, the 110th AALS Annual Meeting starts in New York. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
Here is IP Thinktank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
” In re Bergamo Medical, P.C., 17 Misc.3d 182, 840 N.Y.S.2d 709 (New York Supreme Court 2007). [read post]
Immigration Courts in Los Angeles, California and New York City, New York. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
John: Grammy-Winning Musician Dies At 77 (2019-06-07)https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-48551452 Random Stuff A reminder that perspective matters. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Coverage was expectedly broad with the Financial Times, New York Times and Huffington Post, among others commenting. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark There have been several very high profile news reports of significant law firm data breaches. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:18 am
The acquittal in 1735 of the printer John Peter Zenger, charged with seditious libel against the governor of New York, shone in American memories. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
In his Report (pp. 42-45, paras. 55-68), Referee Crespo acknowledges New York case law -- at least in the matrimonial valuation context -- permitting key person discounts, including a key person discount "combined as part of a marketability discount" (citing Beckerman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Germany: data protection authorities issue GDPR fining guidelines”. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]