Search for: "Matters v. Manufacturers Trust Co."
Results 241 - 260
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
On conditions for (DELETED) Co. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:40 pm
Whether it is appropriate to reconsider State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:21 pm
Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 5:14 am
Why, for that matter, must information be in the form of an article or a textbook at all? [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:28 am
Co v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 7:13 pm
Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:33 pm
While several tests were analyzed, one test of particular note (the "useful, concrete, and tangible result" test associated with methods of doing business in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mundy, No. 06-1190 Conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and possessing a firearm in the furtherance of a drug crime is affirmed over claim that court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that the attempted flight of co-defendant supported an inference of defendant's consciousness of guilt. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 5:51 pm
Grant Co. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:59 am
Stanway v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
, Global Global - General Candidates for post of WIPO Director General present their platforms: (WIPO), IP is not a thing: (Dilanchian), FOSS adoption and consumer welfare: (IPcentral) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Manufacturers becoming brand licensing companies: (IP ThinkTank), Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement moves forward: (Michael Geist) Global - Patents Office Open XML voted to become official standard, so out of Microsoft’s… [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 4:44 am
Nash in New York County adopts the Second Department's holding: "Public policy dictates that courts pay particular attention to fee arrangements between attorneys and their clients, as it is important that a fee contract be fair, reasonable, and fully known and understood by the client (see Jacobson v Sassower, 66 NY2d 991, 993, 499 NYS2d 381, 489 NE2d 1283 [1985]; Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172, 176, 507 NYS2d 610, 499… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya… [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Filed 2/26/08 The Upper Deck Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:The European call for copyright extension for performers: (John Carroll), (The IP Factor), (Spicy IP), (Public Knowledge), (IPR-Helpdesk), (Techdirt), (Innovationpartners),Full CAFC to reexamine the scope of subject matter patentability for business methods, also to consider whether it is appropriate to reconsider or overrule State Street Bank… [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 1:51 pm
(5) Whether it is appropriate to reconsider State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Every opportunity to establish compliance with, for example, the FDA's good manufacturing practices, should be taken. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Parker, No. 05-5191 Denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a capital case is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) invalid waiver of petitioner's right to counsel; 2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel; 3) Brady violations; 4) a failure to grant petitioner a separate trial from his co-defendant; 5) a due process violation due to admission of hair-matching evidence; 6) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel; 7) denial of a state-court forum in which to raise… [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 4:00 am
Nash in New York County adopts the Second Department's holding:"Public policy dictates that courts pay particular attention to fee arrangements between attorneys and their clients, as it is important that a fee contract be fair, reasonable, and fully known and understood by the client (see Jacobson v Sassower, 66 NY2d 991, 993, 499 NYS2d 381, 489 NE2d 1283 [1985]; Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172, 176, 507 NYS2d… [read post]
