Search for: "Matthew C. Brown"
Results 241 - 250
of 250
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
Richard C. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am
Closing argument can be a powerful tool to assist the jury in considering what are sometimes very different sides of a case. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:10 pm
Key Findings Introduction Climate Change and Energy Consumption Cost Recovery and Expensing, Explained Energy Tax Policy in the United States Energy Efficiency and Climate Change Increased Capital Stock Turnover Retrofitting Accelerating the Shift Towards Clean Energy Housing Investment, Density, and Sprawl A Word on Policy Neutrality Expensing Is a Great Complement for Green Policies Conclusion Key Findings Expensing for capital investments would increase new investment and capital stock… [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
District Judge Irene C. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
District Judge Irene C. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Christopher Shawn Mills, 36, admitted he was involved with chrome plating at Mills Plating shop located on Robert C. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Christopher Shawn Mills, 36, admitted he was involved with chrome plating at Mills Plating shop located on Robert C. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board found however that summary judgment regarding the gross backpay and other amounts for Ronald Hamilton, Matthew Aldrich, and Benjamin Adair was not appropriate because the Respondent set forth specific alternative figures for the pay rates of these three individuals and, accordingly raised a factual issue regarding their pay rates. [read post]
