Search for: "May v. Department of Corrections et al" Results 241 - 260 of 439
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  There have also been reports that the FTC is actively investigating violations of past merger consent decrees, potentially with the aim of unwinding the previously cleared merger.15 In this vein, the agencies have been issuing “close at your own risk” letters to merging parties in non-challenged and non-remedy transactions that remind the parties that the agencies retain the authority to challenge mergers after they have closed and that expiration of an HSR waiting period does not… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:00 am by Eilionoir Flynn
Lord et al, writing about Article 13 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which protects people with disabilities’ right to access justice, note that: “Access to justice” is a broad concept, encompassing people’s effective access to the systems, procedures, information, and locations used in the administration of justice. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:26 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
” Such agreements have been recognized as valid by various courts in USA such as in Department of Labor v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am by Gary Nitzkin
In Jerman v Carlisle, et al, the defendant law firm transmitted a collection letter to Ms. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:59 am by Gary Nitzkin
In Jerman v Carlisle, et al, the defendant law firm transmitted a collection letter to Ms. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Robert Chesney
The Justice Department certainly will deny it in their response. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
Colorado Department of Corrections: inmate sues after falling during an escape attempt; claims state failed to make jail "reasonably escape-proof" Lincoln v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:36 am
Katakis, et. al., Corrected Notice of Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities 2 (May 5, 2014). [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL., Appellees/Cross-Claimants/plaintiffs. 3rd District.Appeals -- Timeliness -- Untimely motion for rehearing did not toll rendition of final order for purposes of appeal -- Appeal dismissedIVORY MILES, JR., Appellant, v. [read post]