Search for: "McGUIRE v. McGUIRE" Results 241 - 260 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm by Scott W Lawrence
«4» The Court of Appeals held that physical control while under the influence is an included offense, relying on its prior analysis in McGuire v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, tenure may be acquired in consideration of certain military service performed during a probationary period or by other lawful process.York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, sets out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons,… [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, tenure may be acquired in consideration of certain military service performed during a probationary period or by other lawful process.York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, sets out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons,… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:19 am by David Lat
Alvarez, Contempt, Coquina Investments, Coquina Investments v. [read post]