Search for: "Meals v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am by Fred Yarger
He filed an amicus brief for the state in support of the church in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 1:02 pm
  He was born in Lodi, California to Yemeni immigrants, but after 9/11 his mother moved him and his five siblings to Yemen, while his father stayed in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm by David Post
Earlier today, Judge Messitte of the Maryland federal district court ruled that the "Emoluments Clause" case - the nicely-captioned DC & State of Maryland v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In April 2011, with trial imminent, the United States Supreme Court handed down Concepcion. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 7:06 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding no appellate case law examining whether, for purposes of the OCSLA, state wage and hour laws are inconsistent with the FLSA, the court turned to the language of the statute, which makes the laws of the adjacent state, “[t]o the extent that they are applicable and not inconsistent with this subchapter or with other Federal laws… the law of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
This bill is supported by the likes of the United Parcel Service ("UPS"), who has argued that the bill would allow unionized transportation companies to negotiate flexible terms for the timing of meal periods because current law significantly restricts the freedom of drivers to decide for themselves when they can take their meal periods. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:31 am by Steven Boranian
  On implied preemption, the defendant emphasized correctly that only the United States can enforce the FDCA. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 4:00 pm by rquintilone
Athens Services then filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court, which denied the petition on January 11, 2010 (Athens Disposal Co., Inc. v. [read post]