Search for: "Michaels v. Post" Results 241 - 260 of 9,232
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 10:38 am by Howard Bashman
“Trump Lawyer Reads the Constitution Like a Secret Code Requiring Decryption”: Law professor Michael C. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
By Yousuf Syed Khan (@yousufsyedkhan) (October 17, 2023) Expert Guidance: Law of Armed Conflict in the Israel-Hamas WarBy Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw), Michael W. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:45 pm by Steven Calabresi
 This is dispositive proof that the Presidency is also not an "office *** under the United States" for the purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.The post Offices Under the United States and the Oral Argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On January 29, 2024, Acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu spoke at the University of Michigan Stephen M. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Michael Luttig, who served on the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]