Search for: "Miller v. Pennsylvania" Results 241 - 260 of 425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2013, 9:35 am by Lorene Park
A federal district court in Pennsylvania also adopted the narrow approach to the definition of “exceeds authorized access,” dismissing CFAA claims against employees who started working for a competitor before resigning, during which time they downloaded thousands of documents to external devices (Dresser-Rand Co v Jones, July 23, 2013, Brody, A). [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally:  Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:33 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Restrictive Covenants Unenforceable - Lessons In Drafting From Ontario Court Arkansas legislature approves bill banning abortions after 20 weeks Four peanut company managers are charged in salmonella outbreak; charges include lying to FDA Law firm’s hijacked keywords not a privacy violation, appeals court says Former PM John Turner retires from Miller Thomson Guantanamo judge gives defense lawyers access to secret detention area Pennsylvania Supreme Court justice convicted… [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 8:49 pm by John Whitaker
July 8, 2011)(tortious interference state claim premised on DMCA takedown notices preempted by Federal DMCA provision); see also Miller v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by Cormac Early
In an article for The Atlantic, Garrett Epps questions whether Justice Scalia is “still relevant” and  argues that “October 1 may be the first day of the post-Scalia era.” The Pennsylvania Supreme Court heard arguments yesterday on whether Miller v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:56 am by Sanford Rosen
  I thought about that project, and the “be careful of what you wish for” principle, when I read Chief Justice Roberts’s dissent in Miller v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Elizabeth Fiedler of Newsworks reports on efforts by Pennsylvania inmates sentenced to life without parole for offenses committed as juveniles to secure new sentencing hearings in light of Miller v. [read post]