Search for: "Minis v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 318
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Texas: Second mini-markman proceeding doesn’t result in summary judgment of noninfringement: Whetstone (EDTexweblog.com) Court of Federal Claims: Judge’s mind not changed by reexamination outcome: TDM America v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Texas: Second mini-markman proceeding doesn’t result in summary judgment of noninfringement: Whetstone (EDTexweblog.com) Court of Federal Claims: Judge’s mind not changed by reexamination outcome: TDM America v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
United States that the appeal was waived for procedural reasons and in any case, the VA's actions were not the proximate cause of Gerald's stroke. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:48 am by Kluwer Blogger
These questions were highly contentious in the United States during the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  A bunch of plaintiffs from the United Kingdom sought to sue in the United States, despite their drugs being subject to an entirely different regulatory framework. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:40 am by Sean Wajert
Plaintiff proposed a nationwide class (or a New York class) of all consumers who purchased or leased new 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 MINI vehicles equipped with Run-Flat Extended Mobility Technology tires manufactured by Goodyear and sold or leased in the United States whose Tires have gone flat and been replaced. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:49 pm by Greg Mersol
 Over 4,100 plaintiffs ultimately opted in from over 2,000 AT&T Mobility stores across the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd Tugendhat J had stated that whatever definition of what is defamatory was adopted, ‘it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims’. [read post]