Search for: "Mitchell Marshall"
Results 241 - 260
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
RETAIL CONSIGNEES FOR FSIS RECALL 034-2009 (EXPANDED) FSIS has reason to believe that the following retail location(s) received assorted beef products that have been recalled by JBS Swift Beef Company. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:52 pm
We do this in support of the US Marshals Service and at the request of state and local law enforcement. - Notice he now added the "or noncompliant? [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
The government then marshals evidence to support the conclusion that hostilities remain ongoing. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am
Mitchell, for Discover Bank, Appellee.Anderson McLay "Andy" Simmons, for Shawn C. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upholding the convictions of three top Nixon Administration White House officials for obstructing investigations into the 1972 Watergate break-in: former Attorney General John Mitchell, former Assistant to the President H.R. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Financial Disclosures Reveal Postmaster General’s Business Entanglements and Likely Conflicts of Interest, Experts Say CNN – Marshall Cohen | Published: 8/12/2020 Postmaster General Louis DeJoy continues to hold a multimillion-dollar stake in his former company XPO Logistics, a U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Judge John Marshall said Twitter was “immune from the defamation claims of” Nunes due to federal law that says social media companies are not liable for what people post on their platforms. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Dale Lee Berg, III (Student Author) Killing Me Softly Should a Risk of Pain Dismiss Lethal Injection ... 35 Thurgood Marshall Law Rev 277 (2010). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
We have been writing about the pervasive importance of the Trump Administration's National Security Strategy as a driver of U.S. foreign and strategic policy (here, here, and here). [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
I have compiled the following list of Dallas-area lawyers on Twitter and their respective Twitter handles. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Mitchell L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Mitchell L. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:40 pm
Ultimately, Eddie Antar was brought back to justice to face trial in the United States, kicking and scheming, as he was handcuffed and accompanied by US Marshals. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
I see no reason to add to the already excellent spate of commentaries on the flaws in the reasoning and legal analysis devised by Judge Vaughan Walker to hold California's Proposition 8 unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
The New York Times has noted that a right-wing advocacy group, helmed by former Trump advisor during his term in office Stephen Miller, has filed a class-action lawsuit “that echoes many of the committee’s accusations and focuses on some of the same defendants,” including researchers at Stanford, the University of Washington, the Atlantic Council, and the German Marshall Fund. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
By Suzanna Neal and the Center for Art Law Team On January 30th, 2024, the trial of Accent Delight International Ltd. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
Chief Justice John Marshall’s tenure and the long reign of justices during the “Lochner Era” are a testament to this reality. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
In TC Heartland, the accused infringer has asked the Supreme Court to reset the law of venue and give effect to the statutory statement that infringement actions be brought either (1) “in the judicial district where the defendant resides” or (2)” where the defendant has committed acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
” Race-conscious policies are illegal under Title VI (though not necessarily under the 14th Amendment) Jonathan Mitchell writes for the America First Legal Foundation that the court does not need to consider the 14th Amendment because “[t]he language of Title VI makes no allowance for racial considerations in university admissions. [read post]
