Search for: "Morris v. Goode" Results 241 - 260 of 794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2018, 3:26 am by Louise Thorning Ahle
Philip Morris based its opposition on the indisputably reputed EU trademark registration          (ROOF TOP) for identical or highly similar goods. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
Morris National, Inc, Cancellation No. 92052158 [Petition to cancel a registration for the mark NUTFFLES for "chocolate and candy," on the ground of likely confusion with the registered mark P-NUTTLES, in standard character and design form, for "nut candies"].April 24, 2013 - 2 PM: Edgecraft Corportion v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am by INFORRM
This rationale is referred to as the ‘Bonnick Principle’ following the 2002 Privy Council decision in Bonnick v Morris  [2003] 1 AC 300. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:02 am by Kashmir Hill
Google is good for Microsoft. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
The 6th District came to the same conclusion as Morris in State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 12:11 pm by Andrew Frisch
Because Morris involved transportation of goods not passengers, the Third Circuit looked at cases arising in other contexts that defined interstate transportation of passengers, including United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
Philip Morris, Inc., ___ P.3d ___, 2009 WL 1563373 (Nev. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]