Search for: "Mr. Reynolds" Results 241 - 260 of 536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am by INFORRM
  The issue was whether the published article was still protected by Reynolds privilege after the “Times” has been informed that the claimant had been cleared of the allegations made against him. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:49 am by Matthew Hill
Second, Mr Reynolds had been a voluntary resident at the support unit. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
This is a claim by Mr Khalid Ansari against Vilnius University and other defendants concerning serious allegations made about Mr Ansari during his time as an employee of Manchester Metropolitan University. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:16 am by Wessen Jazrawi
In reaching her decision, the Home Secretary had weighed the “serious potential effects of lifting the exclusion on the UK’s interests in relation to Iran” and had found that the damage to the public interest significantly outweighed any interference with Mrs Rajavi’s ability to express her views here. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:26 am by sally
The Supreme Court restored the decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat ([2009] EWHC 2375 (QB)) who had ruled, on the hearing of a preliminary issue, that the Times was entitled to rely on the defence of Reynolds qualified privilege in relation to the printed publication of the article about the claimant.” Full story UK Human Rights Blog, 22nd March 2012 Source: www.ukhumanrightsblog.com [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Comment The decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat in Flood was the first occasion on which a national newspaper had successfully relied on a Reynolds defence. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:28 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC
Comment The decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat in Flood was the first occasion on which a national newspaper had successfully relied on a Reynolds defence. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:22 am by INFORRM
Comment The decision of Mr Justice Tugendhat in Flood was the first occasion on which a national newspaper had successfully relied on a Reynolds defence. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Available at SSRN Tan, David, The Reynolds Privilege in a Neo-Confucianist Communitarian Democracy: Reinvigorating Freedom of Political Communication In Singapore (December 31, 2011). [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am by INFORRM
She argues it stands “as a useful reminder of where the law stands” and “helps to clarify what will and will not be allowed in attempts to defend libel claims by way of justification and/or the Reynolds defence of responsible journalism“. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:12 pm
Reynolds are really piling up the karma, wouldn't you say? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-199 (involving harmess error analysis), Mr. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
There are no adjudicated PCC complaints to report but resolved complaints include: Sally Low v The Independent, Clause 1, 27/01/2012; Mr Syed Ahmad v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Colin Philip v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; David Bret v The Sun, Clause 1, 26/01/2012; Mr Damien Collis v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012, Mr Peter Reynolds v Lancashire Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/01/2012 Karen Birch v Oldham Evening Chronicle, Clause 1,… [read post]