Search for: "Murphy v. USA" Results 241 - 260 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2018, 12:54 pm by Adam Feldman
Murphy Oil USA (the appeals court in the case granted and denied the petition in part), the Supreme Court’s decision in Sessions v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Ray[12] rejected a Muslim death row inmate's claim about a right to have a spiritual advisor of his faith present during the execution, while Murphy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Members Miscimarra and Johnson filed separate dissenting opinions (Murphy Oil USA, Inc, October 28, 2014). [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Murphy Professor of Law and Public Policy Studies, Duke University School of Law Panelists:--Scott G. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 16-307 Issue: Whether arbitration agreements with individual employees that bar them from pursuing work-related claims on a collective or class basis in any forum are prohibited as an unfair labor practice under 29 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 11:50 am by Amy Howe
Murphy Oil USA), there were opening-day ceremonies to deal with. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:32 am by Andy
It is arguable that this has happened to the extent that some cases like FAPL v Murphy, or the Meltwater trilogy, have resulted in good precedents made by the UK courts, albeit backed up by CJEU referrals. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
Murphy Oil USA, Inc., a pending cert petition that is one of several that ask the “US Supreme Court to decide on the legality of arbitration agreements that bar employees from pursuing work-related claims on a collective or class basis. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
First Amendment Cases In the case of USA v Alvarez (21 March 2011), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit refused an en banc re-hearing of an appeal in which the Stolen Valor Act 2005 had been struck down. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:48 pm by Joy Waltemath
Horton and Murphy Oil USA, Inc, the Board determined that the agreements unlawfully required employees, as a condition of their employment, to waive rights to pursue class or collective actions involving work-related claims in all forums, whether arbitral or judicial. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Murphy Oil USA, Inc. used a Special Master to determine fees since the attorneys were in disagreement. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]