Search for: "Myers v. Good"
Results 241 - 260
of 483
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2014, 3:39 am
The attorneys representing Sirius XM Radio Inc. in the potentially industry-shaking copyright litigation about pre-1972 sound recordings, O'Melveny & Myers, have been rapped by District Judge Colleen McMahon in Manhattan who has now ruled that she hadn't erred when she failed to apply the 1940 case of RCA Manufacturing v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:33 am
”In Gao v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 401–25 (1819) (same); Legal Tender Cases, 79 U.S. 457, 536–38 (1870) (paper money); Myers v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A reader recently suggested (we apologize, we seem to have lost that email) that we do a 50-state survey of where the various states stand on this subject – along the lines of the post we did in 2008 on informal interviews with treating physicians.We thought that was a good idea, although it took us more time than we had hoped to put this together. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:26 am
In Cadle v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 9:16 am
Car accident injury lawyers in Fort Myers note while this appears on the surface to depart from the 2005 Florida Supreme Court decision in Allstate Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
And it is unclear from the statute whether the “good motives” defense is satisfied when at least one of the speaker’s motives is good, only when all of the speaker’s motives are good, or when the good motive predominates (whatever that might mean). [read post]
Judge plans to take Microsoft-Samsung contract dispute over Android royalties to trial in early 2015
9 Sep 2014, 1:28 am
While there are ever clearer signs of Apple v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Liberty is not “I do what I want”; grown up understanding is ordered liberty, reconciling competing claims/rights, and that’s what property/copyright does.Palmer: Rivalrous v. nonrivalrous: good reason to have property, because it avoids conflict over rivalry. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Myers (1983) (p. 567). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:11 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:48 pm
In Alldredge v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:48 pm
Category: 103 By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleBristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
For the reasons discussed below, I consider that the present case provides a good illustration of this. [read post]
15 May 2014, 9:36 am
” See, e.g., Myers v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
In this case, the court’s common sense interpretation and application of CEQA Guidelines section 15203 was just good CEQA horse sense. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
It is a flagrant violation of Brady v. [read post]
