Search for: "National By-products, Inc. v. the United States" Results 241 - 260 of 1,805
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2021, 9:00 am by Seeger Weiss
The case is pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm by Bill Marler
Appx. 774 (9th Cir. 2012) (“USDA responded to the Hornes’ rulemaking petition—as it must under the Administrative Procedure Act”); WWHT, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am by Radhi Shah (USC Gould School of Law)
28 U.S.C § 1498 (a) (Governmental Use) The United States (U.S.) does not have any provisions for a compulsory license. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm by Michael Douglas
Gibbs has been described as irreconcilable with the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency 1997 (the 1997 Model Law),[16] which is generally[17] regarded as embodying ‘modified universalism’. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
  Established in 1931, SGA has for 90 years successfully operated with a two-word mission statement: “Protect Songwriters,” and continues to do so throughout the United States and the world. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 7:58 am by Kristian Soltes
This competitor has outpaced Delaware’s legislative progress, is purported by Forbes to be the “Delaware of digital asset law,” and has sparked rumors that it could chip away at Delaware’s dominance as the corporate capital of the United States. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.] that the State's public accommodation law, as applied to a private parade, "violates the fundamental rule of protection under the First Amendment, that a speaker has the autonomy to choose the content of his own message. [read post]