Search for: "Neil Long"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 5:03 pm
In exercising its discretion to permit the bankruptcy case to proceed, the Bankruptcy Court noted that Hacienda’s “passive ownership of stock, with intent to liquidate that stock to pay creditors, will terminate any connection with cannabis” and that Hacienda did not intend to profit from an ongoing scheme to distribute cannabis as long as it did not retain its stock for too long of a time. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
by Neil H. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
Hardison, she observed, “has been on Congress’s radar screen for a very long time, and they’ve never changed it. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:27 am
Justice Neil Gorsuch for one was emphatic in his view that such an allegation should be sufficient for the case to proceed. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:40 am
The federal government counters that the EEOC and courts have actually “long understood” the Supreme Court’s decision in Hardison to provide more protection for religious employees “than the ‘de minimis’ language read in isolation might suggest. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
When that happens, some people in the center and on the left will claim, as they did during the Obama administration, that there is a “perfectly legal” and seemingly magical workaround that the Biden administration should exploit: minting a platinum coin of a sufficiently large denomination to allow the US to continue to pay its bills, sidestepping the debt ceiling entirely.We have long thought that this idea is lunacy. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Neil Foster, Law and Religion Australia: Is declining to print a Pride poster unlawful? [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
For those of us who live our lives in the field of higher education, events that seem internal to our world sometimes unexpectedly burst into public view. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 3:57 am
Neil Foster (to whom my thanks for bringing the judgment to public attention, and who is far better qualified to comment on it than I am) has posted a long critique of the judgement, here: Liability of a bishop for abuse by clergy – on appeal. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am
by Neil H. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
The debates in both countries crystallize a long-standing tension raised by judicial review of legislation: why and when should courts be authorized to invalidate policies enacted by the political branches on grounds of unconstitutionality? [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 1:41 am
This business model fit squarely within the notion of "the long tail", popularized by Chris Anderson, here, which was then all the rage. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
The report is 456 pages long. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 3:53 am
Neil MacFarquhar reports for the New York Times. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
“, University of Pittsburgh Law Review 82 (2021), pp. 847-880 (available here) Brannigan, Neil “Resolving conflicts: establishing forum non conveniens in a new Hague jurisdiction convention”, Journal of Private International Law 18 (2022), pp. 83-112 Cai, Ya-qi “Feasibility Study on China’s Ratification of the HCCH Judgment Convention from the Perspective of Indirect Jurisdiction”, Journal of Taiyuan Normal University (Social Science Edition) 2021-04, pp. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The internet’s nascent phase is long past. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
A Politico investigation revealed an effort by TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, dating back to at least 2018, long before concerns about TikTok’s Chinese ownership reached their current pitch. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:14 pm
by Neil H. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
This summer, the Supreme Court reversed its long-standing precedent finding a Constitutional right to abortion under the Fourteenth Amendment, removing a fundamental right that has disproportionately benefited women for the past fifty years. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
This summer, the Supreme Court reversed its long-standing precedent finding a Constitutional right to abortion under the Fourteenth Amendment, removing a fundamental right that has disproportionately benefited women for the past fifty years. [read post]
