Search for: "New v. New"
Results 241 - 260
of 165,589
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 2:18 am
ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd[2011] EWCA Civ 439; [2011] WLR (D) 141 “The principles applicable to the grant of an interim injunction restraining publication of private information were well established, but in appropriate cases the court’s approach was to be tempered by a clearer acknowledgment of the importance of the best interests of children. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
News America Marketing, a false advertising/antitrust trial, pending before the Court [...] [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Jarvey, presiding) issued an order denying the defendant’s request for a new trial in Bouaphakeo v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 4:04 pm
by Brian WolfmanIn a mammoth opinion on a number of topics, the New Jersey Appellate Division, beginning at page 109, provides its take on what is required to preempt under the Supreme Court's recent drug preemption ruling in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am
Today rings in the 50th anniversary of the SCOTUS decision in New York Times v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 4:20 am
A new contested case has been brought in White Plains, Lava Records v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:51 am
The most important case in New Jersey DWI history is State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
In Teague v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 3:43 pm
The complaint is here: “New Georgia Project v Raffensperger. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:18 pm
Committee for Re-Evaluation of the T-Line Loop v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of such… [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the New York-New Jersey Port Authority's arguments that as a bi-state entity created by a federally approved compact it cannot be held liable under Labor Law §§240(1) or 241(6) for injuries plaintiff allegedly sustained while working in a building owned by the Authority.The court explained that the Compact Clause of the United States Constitution is not implicated by the application of such… [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:40 am
The Court has granted one new case, Jennings v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:22 am
There is a new contested case in South Carolina, SONY v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:49 am
Franks: New Public Employee Free Speech Decision The Supreme Court, on June 19, 2014, handed down an important public employee free speech decision in Lane v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am
The Court heard arguments in the case of Connick v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:04 pm
News, andValassis v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:42 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 30 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: SSHD v MN and KY [2014] UKSC 30 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:49 am
The opinion is Tobar v. [read post]
