Search for: "No Respondents Named"
Results 241 - 260
of 30,629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 4:00 am
Best Regards, DO NOT RESPOND TO THESE EMAILS. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:30 am
When defendants asked plaintiff to state his full name, however, plaintiff responded that his name was Rogasciano Santiago, not Juan Ortiz. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
"The Board concluded that Respondents' contention regarding continued use "is based on the false premise that the ... documents displaying use of the 'Jonathan Logan' trade name is analogous to trademark use. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 1:07 pm
This past week, the defendants in the Minsky trademark infringement case responded with a number of their own court filings. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am
The respondent submits that their tortious claims meet the criterion for the gateway in paragraph 3.1(9)(a) of PD 6B, namely that “damage was sustained… within the jurisdiction”. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 7:58 am
If a person’s name must be listed, it will be the trustee’s name, not the first responder’s. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:24 am
An attorney who had signed the names of judges to five subpoenas without permission has been struck from the rolls by the New York Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department: ...respondent states that on or about April 10, 2012,... [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:38 am
The Maryland Supreme Court (it may take me awhile to get used to the name change) has imposed disbarment by consent of a former prosecutor the Respondent, Adam Lane Chaudry, is disbarred from the practice of law in the State... [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
“No,” his mother immediately responded sternly as she whipped her head around and looked down at her child. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 9:48 am
The University of Houston Law Center (“UH”) responded by promptly obtaining a temporary injunction against the name change and accusing South Texas of various trademark violations. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:58 am
Inexplicably, that Respondent's name is named in ... [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:05 am
The Respondent in Gibson, LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The Commissioner ruled that the appeal must be dismissed for failure to personally serve the only "named respondent", the Board of Education of the school district. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The Commissioner ruled that the appeal must be dismissed for failure to personally serve the only "named respondent", the Board of Education of the school district. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
This knowledge enables them to investigate and respond effectively to cyber incidents and potential legal disputes involving domain names. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 11:00 am
Smith, JSA, and the hospital responded to their notices “by informing the [plaintiffs] that Dr. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:51 pm
This appeal arose from Respondent Town of Liberty enacting Local Law No. 2 (2011), and Petitioners subsequently commencing a proceeding seeking to annul the law, naming as respondents the Town, respondent Gary Zalkin (doing business as Liberty Scrap Metal) and respondent Ben Weitsman and Son, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:11 am
The respondent forfeits the disputed domain name while the complainant is merely chided. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 1:20 pm
(Mar. 26, 2010) [scribd] The Fourth Circuit recently held that the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of a defendant, and rejected plaintiff's argument that counsel's failure to respond to a defense motion for summary judgment was excusable due to email, malware, and domain name issues. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
However, the court issued a preliminary injunction barring the school district from (absent a reasonable concern of harm or abuse) precluding teachers from responding to a parent's inquiry, or lying to parents. [read post]
