Search for: "OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER v"
Results 241 - 260
of 11,800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2018, 1:17 pm
The Appeals Court affirmed the revocation of the defendant’s probation in Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 5:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:49 am
On October 8, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Burt v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:43 am
While exposure of official police misconduct is "generally of great consequence to the public," the Second Circuit has also stated that "no authority supports the argument that reporting an alleged crime always implicates a matter of public concern," such in Nagle v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:20 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in June 2016 in State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:20 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in June 2016 in State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 5:13 am
State, 2008 Ga. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 9:01 pm
Butler of the Minnesota Public Defender’s office will argue for the petitioner, and Patrick C. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 3:02 pm
EFF has submitted comments to the Patent Office urging it not to support efforts to undermine the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Alice v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 9:01 pm
Jerry Beard of the federal public defender’s office in Fort Worth, Tex., will argue for the petitioner, and Lisa Schertler of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the respondent. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:43 am
This post discusses the first published North Carolina appellate court strip search case since these posts: State v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm
Mr Hay sued in libel, stating that the publications had caused serious damage to his reputation and that he had lost bookings as a self-employed tattooist as a result. [read post]
14 May 2013, 1:05 pm
The office was formed in the years after the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Gideon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:42 pm
In fact, there are many nuances to victims’ involvement in the criminal system, to the extent that the State’s Attorneys Office in CT testified against a proposed bill. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:39 am
The case is State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 2:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
In a decision handed down on 24 June 2016 (TLT and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 2217 (QB)) Mitting J ordered the Home Office to pay six claimants a combined total of £39,500 for the misuse of private information and breaches of the Data Protection Act (“DPA”) 1998 arising from the publication online of a spreadsheet. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 10:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
