Search for: "OFFICE OF STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER v"
Results 241 - 260
of 11,807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
However, this time, Bouvier was not a defendant in this case. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
During the infringement period identified by the Commission in its decision of 19 July 2016, those subsidiaries purchased indirectly, either as owners or under a financial leasing arrangement, 71 trucks from the defendant in several Member States. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
While many states look to Delaware as an authority on issues of corporate law, companies that are incorporated in other states should consult with local counsel to ensure that any relevant differences are taken into consideration. [2] See, e.g., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
Wilson avers: "The United States Supreme Court disables the states' responsibility to protect public safety, reduce gun violence, and safeguard peaceful public movement. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
The new Texas Illegal Entry Law will allow any law enforcement officer in Texas to arrest a person suspected of illegally being within the Texas borders. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
From Magistrate Judge Robert Norway's report and recommendation in Frank v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:04 am
., Thorpe v Cerbco, Inc., CIV. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
United States Taylor Swift is threatening legal action against the Florida college student who tracks the private jets of celebrities and public figures, including Swift. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The first installment focused on Justice Gorsuch's colloquies about Officers of the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 10:41 am
Part V covers “Sexual Offences, Public Morals and Disorderly Conduct”. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
"[12] Meanwhile, a New Hampshire newspaper blamed "[t]raitors in the old lady's Cabinet" for "supply[ing] the conspirators with the means of insurrection from the public arsenals," such that "General Scott [was] hampered in his measures to defend the capital. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
That the presidency is not an “office, civil or military, under the United States” for purposes of the first, “Positions” Clause of Section 3. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
We note that in the Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
(2) Is the Presidency an "office ... under the United States? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:59 am
Here is the complaint: Carano v. [read post]
