Search for: "ONLY A MILE v STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated EPA’s policy limiting the reach of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:37 am
Banxcorp v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:49 am
The only direct evidence was the defendant’s testimony that he was driving 30 miles per hour. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:12 pm
(See Gibson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:32 pm
V. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 1:04 pm
I understand and appreciate that, on the high seas, the United States can exercise jurisdiction over "stateless" vessels. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:52 pm
Clark Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:31 am
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:11 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP [2010] UKSC 24 (16 June 2010) - Read judgment The Supreme Court have given the latest judgment on the controversial control order scheme, and in this case have allowed the appeal of a man suspected of terrorism on the grounds that confinement to a flat 150 miles away from his family amounted to a breach of his human rights. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:33 pm
In Horiike v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:11 am
Recently, the California Supreme Court held in Sullivan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 5:20 am
The First Circuit had grappled with much of this in its 2014 decision in Massachusetts Delivery Ass’n v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:34 pm
The Court continues:We also agree with the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Miles v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
” The camera’s daily set-up logs, and the sworn certificate of a technician that V.S. exceeded the speed limit by 10 miles per hour, constituted “prima facie evidence” of the violation.And since this only involved a civil penalty, with no resulting criminal conviction, V.S. wasn’t entitled to all the usual constitutional protections that might have otherwise applied – such as “the protections of the Criminal Procedure Law or Sixth Amendment… [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 2:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:48 am
While the defendant driver stated that she was only traveling at one to two miles-per-hour at the time of impact, the plaintiff alleged that the impact was more severe. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 4:59 am
Only Justice Thomas played the Grinch as the sole dissenter in the Court's 8-1 decision in Lopez v. [read post]
