Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:06 am
United States, No. 13-7451. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:06 am
Yesterday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:28 pm
Referring to last Term’s Bond v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:46 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed undersized fish. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:31 pm
Let’s talk about Yates v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:53 am
At 10 a.m Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hold one hour of argument in Yates v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:37 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am
The State Department defected from Courier a decade ago in favor of Times New Roman. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:57 am
United States, a Sarbanes-Oxley anti-shredding case. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
United States, in which the Court will consider the case of a commercial fisherman convicted of violating the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the destruction of several undersized fish. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:24 pm
The case is Yates v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In DOT v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
In DOT v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:50 am
United States, No. 13-7451, in which the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley act's prohibition against the destruction of evidence applies to a fisherman who tossed a couple of allegedly undersized red grouper overboard before federal agents could seize the piscatorial evidence. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 8:34 am
Yates was given fair notice that throwing undersized fish into the Gulf of Mexico would violate the "document shredding provision" of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:59 am
The court also denied the employee’s motion for partial summary judgment with respect to the Dodd-Frank Act, which did not apply since she asserted her claims under the False Claims Act (FCA) and not the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Stirrup v Education Management LLC, September 16, 2014, Pyle, C). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
As well-stated by Saul Goodman: [read post]
