Search for: "Ohio v. American Express Co" Results 241 - 260 of 303
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
” The court finally denied review on Nov. 20 in six-time relist E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:52 am
Ohio 2004) (ADEs held "irrelevant to establish a material issue of fact"); Dunn v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:20 am
The court held that the third prong in San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
We note, however, that questions about the domain of inquiry—of in-market vs. out-of-market effects—can arise in conduct cases brought under Section 1 of the Sherman Act (as in Ohio v American Express, where the Supreme Court considered both sides of a two-sided transactional platform as a single market) or under Section 2 (as in Aspen Skiing Co., where the Court, considering allegedly exclusionary conduct, held that “it is appropriate… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:33 am by Jeff Gamso
Antonelli Fireworks Co., Inc., though he deleted a bit including the choice reference to "The Walrus and the Carpenter. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included:   Senators Specter and Leahy express concern about ACTA Treaty (Techdirt) (Intellectual Property Watch) (IP Justice) (Michael Geist) (Public Knowledge) (Intellectual Property Watch) Commerce Department cites questionable stats, Chamber of Commerce uses them to ask Bush to sign PRO IP Bill into law (Techdirt) (Techdirt) (Public… [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Introduction. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
Levin, a satellite television provider is challenging the constitutionality of an Ohio law that imposes greater taxes on it than on cable television companies doing business in that state, while in Sandy Creek Energy Associates v. [read post]