Search for: "Opinion of the Judges v Gould"
Results 241 - 260
of 264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2008, 9:19 am
June 2, 2008), decision available here.Though we're not big fans of the opinion, we're huge fans of the Judge: here's hoping for a very speedy recovery.Players: Decision by Judge Betty Fletcher, joined by Judges Kleinfeld and Gould. [read post]
21 May 2008, 2:11 pm
Gould, writing for the majority of the Witt panel, Lawrence v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:23 am
Id. at *10.Of Note: Judge Ikuta's Stoterau decision (joined by Judges Wallace and Gould) is so disappointing on so many fronts it is hard to know where to start. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
Dist. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:53 am
An opinion by Judge Larson, sitting by designation from the Central District. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:38 am
Here's a very nice and tight opinion by Judge Gould. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 11:55 am
Sometimes even a single line in the middle of a lengthy opinion can stand out and strike me as obviously -- and dangerously -- wrong.Like here.The per curiam opinion (joined only by Judges Ferris and Gould) says a lot of things I agree with. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
"The opinion in Fields v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 5:29 am
Judge Gould accomplishes the rare double-play, with last week's great decision in Yida (featured here) and this week's excellent opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 6:59 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:14 pm
Judge Gould wrote the opinion for a unanimous panel, resting the decision squarely on a holding that Reziniano was not unavailable within the meaning of Fed. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 12:00 pm
Plus, that's not all; Judge Gould also includes lines like the following in the actual text of the opinion: "Professor Richard D. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
Which only has four votes: his, Chief Judge Schroeder's, and Judges Fisher and Gould. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Gould, Inc., 475 U.S. 282, 290 (1986) (prior labor precedent).Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 5:49 am
Decision by Judge Gould (right). [read post]
13 May 2007, 12:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 7:34 am
An interesting day in the 9th, where in one opinion there are dueling concurrences over what role a judge should play in Ameline remands, an Apprendi error that was deemed harmless, and an en banc that interprets "bringing to" to mean where illegal aliens are dropped off, and thus is a circuit split.US v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 11:59 am
This is one of the best opinions I've ever read from Judge Gould. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:27 am
Gould way back in 2001, years before Blakely v. [read post]
