Search for: "Oxford v. Oxford"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,529
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:05 pm
In 2019, the court ruled in Rehaif v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Larissa holds an MSc from the University of Oxford and a BA from the University of Toronto. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 4:53 pm
APPEL À COMMUNICATIONS8e Congrès général Palerme, 19-21 Juin 2023Regards dystopiques sur le droitFrancis Bacon aurait-il pu décider que la common law l’emportait sur l’equity (Earl of Oxford’s case)? [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
Accredited journalists in attendance at financial remedy hearings held in private are collaterally bound by that undertaking: Appleton v Gallagher, above, at [10]. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm
This newest update includes leading cases ranging from the classic 1970s landmark judgment in Klass and others v Germany to the Haščák v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
But it would be a risky mistake to dismiss or ignore this latest gambit.Even so, we should not miss the elements of a head-spinning flip-flop that have accompanied this move.In May, following the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health opinion, Graham praised its embrace of states’ rights.As he put it at the time, “If the Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:16 am
Oxford Gene Technology Ltd., 566 F.3d 1012, 1016–17 (Fed. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
~Thomas Jefferson, 1789 To underscore these points, the Framers provided in Article V, not just one but two methods (and four paths) for amendment. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:07 am
Adam Perry (University of Oxford - Faculty of Law) has posted Wednesbury Unreasonableness on SSRN. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 2:36 am
., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2022, pp. v-401. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
A version of this post appeared on the Oxford Business Law Blog here. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
., on Wednesday, August 31, 2022 Tags: Climate change, Comment letters, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Materiality, SEC, Securities regulation, Sustainability Corporate Political Spending and State Tax Policy: Evidence from Citizens United Posted by Cailin Slattery (University of California Berkeley), Alisa Tazhitdinova (University of California Santa Barbara), and Sarah Robinson (University of California Santa Barbara),… [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
This contrasts with Re St Ebbe with Holy Trinity and St Peter Le Bailey [2011] Oxford Const. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm
The amicus brief of the Organization of American Historians in Brackeen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
