Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 241 - 260
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
In re Workflow Management, Inc. - Proposed Joint Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan of Reorganization[By: Randall Reese netDockets.com |In: Bankruptcy]4. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
After, ten dollars here and ten dollars there, and pretty soon you’re talking about a day without donuts. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:56 am
“We’re gearing up, we’re going to be very devoted to this topic,” said Rebecca Katz, a lawyer at Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a plaintiffs firm based in New York. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
(“DHB”) because the settlement "impermissibly releases and indemnifies DHB’s former Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer against all liability arising under § 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act". [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:09 pm
You’re screwed. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:56 pm
Section 105(c)(6) of the Sarbanes-Oxley authorizes the Board to impose sanctions on accounting firms and their supervisory personnel for failing reasonably to supervise associated persons who have violated certain laws, rules, or standards. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:47 am
And while you're at it, please participate in this "Quick Survey on Disclosure Controls and Disclosure Committees. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
FMR LLC that the Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower protections apply to employees of private investment firms that operate and advise mutual funds. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
The Second Circuit’s conclusion is consistent with the holding by the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit in In re Digimarc Corp. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
The Sec-retary is authorized to publish in the Federal Reg-ister standards or methods for such certification, re-quire specific recordkeeping practices with respect tosuch certifications, and audit the records thereof atany time, this authority shall not be construed todiminish or qualify any other penalty provided bythis section.Attorney Chuck Kuck and I have recently concluded that such measures are inevitable, in our article, “The Case for the Inevitable: National Compliance… [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:35 am
-based firms.Grand Jury Re-Indicts Former Judge in Pa. 'Kids for Cash' ScandalThe Legal IntelligencerA federal grand jury has handed down a superseding indictment against former Luzerne County, Pa., Common Pleas Judge Mark A. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:11 am
Filed under: sarbanes-oxley, securities litigation, securities regulation [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:56 am
No, they’re just conforming amendments after all. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
That means summer is over and time to re-focus on good compliance and ethics. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:39 am
An when you're done writing all this down, we're going to put it up on the internet where the other side can read all of your thoughts about these cases. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 1:40 pm
Filed under: corporate governance, sarbanes-oxley [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:17 am
But here at Adam Smith, Esq., we're not into the business of pointing you towards resources and walking away. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:46 am
But perhaps they won't since many of us are looking for them - and if they're found, they aren't "sleepers" by definition, right? [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:26 pm
This move mirrors the one in 2002’s Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dictating the power of audit committees who preside over financial reporting. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:30 am
Assuming the facts are as stated by the SEC, they’re fortunate. [read post]
