Search for: "P Plaintiff" Results 241 - 260 of 13,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
On January 14, 2004, the New York Supreme Court (the trial court in NY) wrote:In keeping with the policy of prohibiting multiple conflicting representations without the clients' consent, P&E's representation of both plaintiffs and UR on related patent issues, without informing plaintiffs, without obtaining plaintiffs' waiver or consent, constitutes a breach of DR 5-105.However, this Court has concluded that a violation of DR 5-105 has… [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
P AICO Receivables LLC, 383 F.3d 341, 344 (5th Cir. 2004) (citing Subway Equip. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:33 pm by Peter Breslauer
P. 23, and when the plaintiffs failed to present any evidence at trial, dismissed the action for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:27 am by The Docket Navigator
"[P]laintiff . . . argues that [its damages expert] was correct not to put a cap on damages because the profits earned by the defendants in the eroded market that they allegedly created should not be used to set the limits on damages. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Op. at p. 10-11 and fn. 12The court ultimately found that, given the history of the case, the Plaintiffs were left with insufficient time to obtain a new expert. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:43 pm by Samantha G. Wilson
As a result, the Court granted the motion to strike this paragraph of plaintiff’s answer. [read post]