Search for: "P and E Construction, LLC" Results 241 - 260 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 pm by John P. Ahlers
A California Court of Appeals has re-affirmed the distinction between responsiveness and responsibility in evaluating bids on public works projects and harshly criticized a school district that wrongfully determined that a low bidder for two projects was non-responsible. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Mar. 24, 2009)/p>Arbitration clause unenforceable against fem attorney's claim of sex discrim/HWE/retalWalsh v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm by MOTP
GIVING CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE Democrat Richard Hightower botches his first National Collegiate Student Loan Trust case after taking office as a member of Houston Court of Appeals Sheila Kirk v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
The syllabus is constructed with these general ideas in mind. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:59 pm by MOTP
Mayes, 236 S.W.3d 754, 755 (Tex. 2007).In this case, the trial court was asked to render a declaratory judgment based on the Note and the First Modification, instruments subject to the general rules of contract construction. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
[Page 1:] The plaintiffs, Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and Bluesnap, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry), … [read post]
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated, “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
After previously issuing a Draft EIR in 2012, and a Final EIR in 2017 for a 30-day review period which stated, “After the [FEIR] is circulated, if Caltrans decides to approve the [p]roject, a [NOD] will be published in compliance with CEQA by Caltrans . . . [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
”19 By negative implication of R.C. 163.14, and based on growing case law, the Court stated that “special benefits” may be considered to the extent that they have a positive impact on the residue’s post appropriation value.20 13 Id. at 3-4 (based on an estimated cost of construction of $300,000 and the required use of 2.5 acres of land valued at ($95,000 per acre). 14 16 Ohio App. 3d 411, at 415 (1984). 15 First Industrial II, 2005 Ohio 6469 at 5-6; see 16 Ohio App.… [read post]