Search for: "PEOPLE v. TAYLOR" Results 241 - 260 of 1,119
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2020, 11:23 am by rainey Reitman
Dunkins (EFF) New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional (EFF) EFF Files Amicus Brief Arguing Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment (Ongoing case of People v Dawes in SF Superior Court re geofence warrants)  People v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29, Oct. 9 and Oct. 16 conferences) Taylor v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
For understanding virtue and the ethics of technology, we can look to a Christianity emphasizing universal love and reconciliation for all people, of all types (including race, gender, sexual orientation). [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 9:36 am
Murphy, Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Work of the International Law Commission International DecisionsMaiko Meguro, State of the Netherlands v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:28 am by INFORRM
A nuisance action was upheld in Walker v Brewster (1867) 5 LR Eq 25 (Ch). where the defendant’s fetes attracted people who sat on a wall adjoining the plaintiff’s property, destroying their privacy. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
All it requires is that people act reasonably in the circumstances. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon-Strauss discussed the latest news in Trump v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]