Search for: "PHILIP MORRIS USA INC"
Results 241 - 260
of 280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
Philip Morris USA, Inc., no. 07-740. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 8:40 am
See Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 1:53 pm
The Supreme Court will consider the petition for certiorari in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 8:07 am
Opinion below (3rd Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (forthcoming) __________________ Docket: 07-806 Case name: Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:24 pm
Philip Morris Inc., following remand by the Supreme Court in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:19 pm
They sued Philip Morris USA, Inc. and its parent company, Altria Group, Inc.,... [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
For the second time in a week, the Ninth Circuit held that Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:01 am
In 2003, Madison County Circuit Judge Nicholas Byron issued a $10.1 billion judgment against Philip Morris USA, saying the company misled customers into believing they were buying a less harmful cigarette. [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 1:23 am
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 449 F.Supp.2d 992, 1239-1241 (E.D.N.Y. 2006), Judge Jack Weinstein wrote: Aggregate Proof Plaintiff's use of aggregate proof does not violate defendants' constitutional rights. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:38 am
Philip Morris USA Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:18 pm
Twombly -- pleading antitrust conspiracy Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
The audience Q&A session (beginning at 50:00) included discussion of the punitive damages decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 3:51 am
The justices ruled that the California appeals court should take another look at the case in light of its February 20, 2007 ruling that set aside an award to a smoker suing Altria Group Inc.'s Philip Morris USA unit. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
"The Draft continues to use the "carve at the joint" metaphor from In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293 (7th Cir. 1995) (e.g., §2.03, comment c & Reporters' Notes) to justify widespread issue certification, even though Rhone-Poulenc used that phrase not in support of issue certification, but to caution against bifurcating a trial in a way that would have different juries examining the same issue in violation of the Seventh Amendment. 51 F.3d… [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
-Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:49 pm
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 6th Cir., No. 05-6481, 2/27/07 (unpublished). [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:06 am
Philip Morris USA, et al. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
Williams Revisited (see Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 1:36 am
Tobacco Company States Lanham Act Claim Against Online Sellers of 'Grey Market' Cigarettes Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
