Search for: "POTTER v DISTRICT COURT"
Results 241 - 260
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The Supreme Court has always been a political body. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Potter, No. 07-35496 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:18 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
She never argued that, because legacy preferences are hereditary, they presented a “suspect” classification that should be judged by the “strict scrutiny” standard under the amendment’s equal-protection clause.The district-court judge in the case, Rosenstock v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
District Court in Massachusetts. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
– ownership of IP: (Dilanchian), Consultant or contractor IP: (Dilanchian), IP and general business law issues: Website terms of use reduce risk: (Dilanchian), Plant breeder’s rights actions in the Federal Court will now be regarded as IP cases for the purpose of docket allocation: (IPwar’s), Ajinomoto v NutraSweet – inventive step and costs: (IPRoo), Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft 2020 submission:… [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:14 am
Waterous Co., 347 F.3d 685, 689 (8th Cir. 2003), and a recent district court case, Basso v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Verizon PA Inco o Court Grants Additional Compensation To Plaintiff To Offset Tax LiabilityEshelman v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: Lupin v Abbott Labs: (FDA Law Blog), Plavix (Clopidogrel) – US: Apotex sues FDA to recover 180-day exclusivity on generic Plavix: (Orange Book Blog), Plavix (Clopidogrel) – US: Former Bristol-Myers Squibb executive charged over lying about Plavix deal struck with rival Apotex: (Managing Intellectual Property), Risperdal (Resperidone) – US: Apotex files motion to intervene in relisting of Risperdal patent case; Teva quickly files opposition: Teva… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Concluding the court wasn't ready to overturn Gregg v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
In an opinion from 31 December 1963 the United States district court wrote, “The State did have in its possession evidence that a particle taken from the vagina of the victim was probably a human hair but was not one belonging to petitioner. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: USPTO upholds one of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF’s) human stem cell patents (decisions are pending on two other patents): (IPKat), (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), English High Court rules Qualcomm’s patents invalid in battle against Nokia: (Philip Brooks),… [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
