Search for: "PRICE v. VIRGINIA" Results 241 - 260 of 813
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Pharmaceutical Pricing Jaime King, University of California Hastings College of the Law, The Burden of Federalism: Challenges to State Attempts at Controlling Prescription Drug Costs Marc Rodwin, Suffolk University Law School, Controlling Pharmaceutical Prices: What the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:38 am by FHH Law
Information subject to ARMIS reporting also may vary depending on whether a carrier is a mid-size or large ILEC or a mandatory price-cap, elective price-cap, or non-price-cap ILEC. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
” Georgia: Stock Redemption Agreement’s “Current Value” Pricing Provision Excludes Minority Discount Wallace v Wallace, 813 S.E.2d 428 [Ct. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am by John Elwood
Remember United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am by John Elwood
§ 2000e-2(a)(1), meant “gender identity” and included “transgender status” when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964; and (2) whether Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
    Long before the elections of 2016, the American Republic had been moving toward more formal and open hostilities in the cultural civil war, one with social, economic, cultural and political consequences, that was one of the great consequences of the immediate post 1945 period. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit erred in concluding—in direct conflict with Virginia’s highest court and other courts—that a decision of the Supreme Court, Montgomery v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit erred in concluding—in direct conflict with Virginia’s highest court and other courts—that a decision of the Supreme Court, Montgomery v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
This type of pitfall was illustrated in the case of InDyne Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Biestek v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
The father quit his job in Virginia and relocated to Onondaga County in order to rehabilitate his relationship with his son, which had suffered since the child was moved to New York. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
The father quit his job in Virginia and relocated to Onondaga County in order to rehabilitate his relationship with his son, which had suffered since the child was moved to New York. [read post]