Search for: "Pacer System" Results 241 - 260 of 920
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2017, 7:49 am
To anyone who uses PACER they will be appalled to hear that there were excess funds that were not applied to improving the PACER system itself --but were redirected to other uses. [read post]
13 May 2017, 4:34 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
   (Editor’s Note:  The actual order isn’t in PACER yet.) [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
The public availability of such orders is, unfortunately for her, the consequence of a public dispute resolution system financed with taxpayer funds. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 pm by Adam Doerr
These petitions are difficult to research, as the orders are generally not published and require significant effort in PACER to uncover. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Ambrogi
The Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to providing free, public access to primary legal materials, has announced plans to download all of the free opinions and order available on PACER, the federal courts’ system for electronic access to court records. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:41 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Downloading, extracting, and hosting all these files will not be easy, but these documents are a critical element of the American legal system. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:57 am by Robert Hambrick
Our judge ruled that the DEA pharmacologist could only testify about stimulant. hallucinogenic, or depressant effects on the human central nervous system. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 10:28 am by admin
 Established in order to cover the cost of operating and maintaining the system, PACER fees now generate millions of dollars in excess revenue each year, becoming, in effect, a general fund for court technology projects. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 8:24 am by Robert Ambrogi
The parties to a putative class action lawsuit claiming that the federal courts’ PACER system routinely overcharges for document downloads have asked the U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:46 pm by maggie
The RECAP Project is a user-driven project to improve free access to documents on the PACER system. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 6:31 am by F. Tim Knight
However, it’s my understanding that despite those findings you still find Social Security Numbers scattered throughout the PACER system. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 4:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Republican members of the subcommittee mainly focused on ways of making the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system and a wide array of court proceedings more available to the public... [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:32 pm by Andrew Hamm
Bruce suggested separating the publishing aspect of PACER from the filing system used by attorneys and courts and entrusting it to an organization that focuses on data publishing. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 6:29 am by Meg Kribble
The oversight hearing will look at several transparency issues, including the effectiveness of the PACER service and use of audio and video recordings of courtroom procedures. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 2:20 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” Plaintiffs assert that the judiciary is charging far more than necessary in PACER fees, and that the fees it collects are going to purposes other than PACER, such as courtroom technology, websites for jurors, and bankruptcy notification systems. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:00 pm by David Kravets
A federal judge overseeing the litigation against PACER, the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system, just certified the case as a class action—meaning anybody who has used the service between 2010-2016 might be entitled to refunds if the government loses or settles. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:00 am by Robert Ambrogi
A federal lawsuit challenging as excessive the fees charged by PACER, the federal courts’ electronic records system, has been certified as a class action. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 10:00 am by Richard M. Re
By then, it was already long past time for the Supreme Court to develop something like the PACER electronic docket system that has operated for many years in the lower federal courts. [read post]