Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 6,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
Moreover, the Justices also unanimously held that the expression “financially independent” in s 117B(3) means an absence of financial dependence upon the state. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 10:12 pm by Darren Olivier
SABC, a state owned company, contented that the decisions do not constitute administrative decisions but contractual ones under their agreement with Via. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
(Para 32).When the place is stated it is equivalent to seat "[b]ut if a condition precedent is attached to 'place', the condition precedent has to be satisfied so that the place can become equivalent to seat. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am by William S. Dodge
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
Sch 5, para 7 of the 2004 Act stipulated that the question of state retirement pension eligibility was to be determined as if the person’s acquired gender had always been their gender. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:08 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Para 17-19 of Vidya Drolia v Durga Trading Corporation is the next interesting aspect we take up in this post. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am by SW
The judge then set out some common ground between the parties, which he described as ‘basic legal points’ (para 7). [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
United States, 523 U.S. 614, 620-21 (1998) Modifica los elementos de la conducta delictiva por los que una persona fue convicto. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
A 1781 Pennsylvania state court case against the state of Virginia, Nathan v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:50 am by Heather Douglas
Buduchnist Credit Union Limited v. 2321197 Ontario Inc. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 10:50 am by WSLL
Summary of Order December 4, 2013Case Name: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:58 am by GUY BLACKWOOD QC, QUADRANT CHAMBERS
Issue 2, emanation of State of Iraq SOMO did not pursue its argument that it was entitled to state immunity as an emanation of the State of Iraq or because it was exercising sovereign authority Issue 3, identification of the creditor By a majority of 3:2, the Supreme Court held that the creditor under the letters of credit was SOMO alone: Lords Clarke (paras 19 to 26), Lord Sumption (paras 61 to 65) and Lord Hodge (paras 74 to 78) accepted… [read post]