Search for: "Parcell v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2017, 4:38 am
United Parcel Services, has been one I’ve also discussed in other places too. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 2:08 pm
The most recent such case, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 10:22 am
United States (1875) – most eminent domain actions have focused on real estate matters. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
On February 12, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued its opinion in Baisden v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:33 am
,” without distinguishing between owners of units and parcels. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:11 am
The amici argued that the lower court’s failure to consider relevant precedents would subvert the North Carolina legislature’s intent to safeguard the integrity of North Carolina’s securities markets for out-of-state and North Carolina investors (NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm
" So the landowner needs to show the diminution in the fair market value of the whole parcel (both the taken part and the remaining part). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm
So the landowner needs to show the diminution in the fair market value of the whole parcel (both the taken part and the remaining part). [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 8:35 pm
Dakota, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 2:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:17 am
May 05, 2009)—In this recent case, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York issued an unpublished opinion denying a host of motions to dismiss and granting leave to the plaintiffs to file a Second Amended Complaint. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:50 am
The father was a citizen of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 5:30 am
See “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018) and “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale” (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 1:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 1:17 am
United States, No. 06-876L (Feb. 22, 2008), a San Diego, California-area property owner sued the federal government in the Court of Federal Claims for just compensation, complaining of the Border Patrol's violation of its property rights:As a result of these initiatives since September 11, 2001, IIP states that Border Patrol agents occupy Parcel 11 on an around-the-clock basis. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
United Parcel Service General Services Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:04 am
United Parcel Service General Services Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:14 pm
Frivolous Quite Title Suit Against Lender Badgley v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:46 am
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), and Cooper v. [read post]
