Search for: "Patterson v. Does"
Results 241 - 260
of 536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2015, 6:28 pm
Apps., decided 11/25/2014)In Hiraldo v Allstate Ins. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm
Jackson, and Doe v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:16 am
The US Supreme Court in the 1992 case of Patterson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
§ 29-26-119; Patterson v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:51 pm
Robbins, 542 So.2d 470, 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (relying in part on evidence that no one had fallen over the concrete blocks at issue during the preceding seventeen years) Doe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Patterson, 357 U.S. 449, 460-62 (1958). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 10:04 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 2:59 am
More than 5,300 people took such preventive steps last year after they ate at a Milan, IL McDonald's where employees were found exposing customers to Hepatitis A.Now people unfortunate enough to dine at the Milan McDonald's last year between June 1 and July 15 have the option of getting some reimbursement for their trouble as a $500,000 class action settlement is pending in Rock Island Country Circuit Court.The Hepatitis A outbreak at the fast food restaurant located in the Quad… [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:38 pm
Citing to essentially dicta in Patterson v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Lim v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:27 am
App. 2006), quoting Patterson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 10:02 pm
The facts of this case are in some ways similar to those of Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:33 am
Yordy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 3:45 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 3:54 pm
" Fashion Fabrics of Iowa v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:40 pm
Patterson, 357 U. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:05 pm
A claim of double jeopardy is sometimes encountered in efforts to suppress a disciplinary action in situations were the charges reflect the same acts or omissions that were the subject of counseling memoranda or performance evaluations.The courts have rejected this theory.** In Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98, the Court of Appeals said that including charges concerning performance that were addressed in a counseling memorandum was not “double jeopardy. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 8:30 am
Doe, Preliminary Injunction Order, No. 14-CV-3492 (SDNY May 29, 2014); AACS-LA v. [read post]
