Search for: "Paxton v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
The court’s decision, Rice v. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 4:19 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Taylor v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
I’ve written this in preparation for the Supreme Court appeal in NetChoice v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 8:23 am
Supreme Court sided with the Texas courts in Medellin v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am
Paxton (5th Circuit opinion). [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
Duty of Care to Fetus Anne Posno of Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP discussed Paxton v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
The current team of lawyers for Hill, the client being tapped for the multi-million dollar amount in attorney’s fees by his former counsel is crying foul, and three amicus briefs, including one by AG Paxton filed on behalf of the State of Texas, have joined the chorus. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:06 am
In December 2020, as vice-president, Pence openly supported the effort by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to overturn election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:38 pm
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Texas’s state attorney general, Ken Paxton, who had led the 26-state coalition in opposition to the Obama directive, issued a statement on Friday applauding the switch in policy. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:24 pm
Paxton and Moody v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. 17 v notice and takedown). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:23 am
In 2013, I wrote an essay explaining the problems with the state AGs’ proposal to exclude state crimes from Section 230. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:34 am
The second set of cases (Moody v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in Fisher v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
V. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
