Search for: "Pearson v. Pearson" Results 241 - 260 of 695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
  Respondents’ merits briefs are due Wednesday in Pearson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 7:05 am
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply __________________ Docket: 07-751 Case name: Pearson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 1:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Pom’s fallback argument was that its ads were only potentially misleading under the terrible Pearson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Pearson (2013) 56 Cal.4th 393, 463.) [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 8:21 pm by Kiera Flynn
The petitions of the day are: Liu v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:41 am
The ruling, in Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group Ltd and Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2009] EWHC 26 (Pat) can be read in full here. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:09 am by Ted Frank
Add the plaintiff-friendly Exxon Shipping v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:00 am
Under these circumstances, the defendant established that its actions did not proximately cause the plaintiffs' alleged damages, and that subsequent counsel had a sufficient opportunity to protect the plaintiffs' rights by pursuing any remedies it deemed appropriate on their behalf (see Ramcharan v Pariser, 20 AD3d 556; Perks v Lauto & Garabedian, 306 AD2d 261; Albin v Pearson, 289 AD2d 272; Kozmol v Law Firm of Allen L. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm by Michael Grossman
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]